Respectfully, the first paragraph implies extreme bias and lacks evidence to support it. Regardless of personal views, those that participated in Jan 6 has yet to receive the right to trial, which should be the main concern, as it was the main point in other chapters concerning American citizens rights. Numerous destructive riots broke out in cities across the United States that changed entire communities, the Corona virus effecting the world economy and the fear mongering… Why not report on those points in the first paragraph as well? To better understand the time period, all aspects should be reported to understand the cause and effects during historical events.
Respectfully, the first paragraph implies extreme bias and lacks evidence to support it. Regardless of personal views, those that participated in Jan 6 has yet to receive the right to trial, which should be the main concern, as it was the main point in other chapters concerning American citizens rights. Numerous destructive riots broke out in cities across the United States that changed entire communities, the Corona virus effecting the world economy and the fear mongering… Why not report on those points in the first paragraph as well? To better understand the time period, all aspects should be reported to understand the cause and effects during historical events.
I unfortunately do not have the time to expand upon this section, but I feel that the entirety of “The Crisis of 1968” is too abbreviated. There should be some mention of the USS Pueblo, a reference to the Tet Offensive here, expanded information of the relationship and importance of RFK, the Olympics, and Apollo 8.
I hope someone will see this comment and consider working on this suggestion.
This is a great intro; I am new here and just started today. I am not entirely sure what we are supposed to be doing here. Are we commenting on each paragraph and speaking our opinions on the text?
I was thinking the same thing. Why couldn’t they find a way to win political control over all the southern states? Or why couldn’t those three states convince the other states to walk side by side with them?
Recent Comments in this Document
November 21, 2024 at 12:25 am
I believe there is an unneeded “the” between ‘by’ and ‘1848’.
See in context
November 20, 2024 at 3:15 pm
Respectfully, the first paragraph implies extreme bias and lacks evidence to support it. Regardless of personal views, those that participated in Jan 6 has yet to receive the right to trial, which should be the main concern, as it was the main point in other chapters concerning American citizens rights. Numerous destructive riots broke out in cities across the United States that changed entire communities, the Corona virus effecting the world economy and the fear mongering… Why not report on those points in the first paragraph as well? To better understand the time period, all aspects should be reported to understand the cause and effects during historical events.
See in context
November 20, 2024 at 3:14 pm
Respectfully, the first paragraph implies extreme bias and lacks evidence to support it. Regardless of personal views, those that participated in Jan 6 has yet to receive the right to trial, which should be the main concern, as it was the main point in other chapters concerning American citizens rights. Numerous destructive riots broke out in cities across the United States that changed entire communities, the Corona virus effecting the world economy and the fear mongering… Why not report on those points in the first paragraph as well? To better understand the time period, all aspects should be reported to understand the cause and effects during historical events.
See in context
November 13, 2024 at 6:33 pm
Mondale also won DC
See in context
November 4, 2024 at 7:47 pm
hola
hola
See in context
October 21, 2024 at 11:40 pm
The last sentence says “to right for voting rights.” I believe it is meant to say “fight” not “right”
See in context
October 17, 2024 at 12:55 am
I unfortunately do not have the time to expand upon this section, but I feel that the entirety of “The Crisis of 1968” is too abbreviated. There should be some mention of the USS Pueblo, a reference to the Tet Offensive here, expanded information of the relationship and importance of RFK, the Olympics, and Apollo 8.
I hope someone will see this comment and consider working on this suggestion.
See in context
September 16, 2024 at 1:51 pm
“Westinghouse” link is broken. Relatedly, watermark for “sallyedelsteincollage.com” is still visible at the bottom of the advertisement.
See in context
September 14, 2024 at 9:28 pm
This is a great intro; I am new here and just started today. I am not entirely sure what we are supposed to be doing here. Are we commenting on each paragraph and speaking our opinions on the text?
See in context
September 5, 2024 at 9:46 pm
I was thinking the same thing. Why couldn’t they find a way to win political control over all the southern states? Or why couldn’t those three states convince the other states to walk side by side with them?
See in context