Hello world!
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!
Categories:
UncategorizedYou can follow any comments on this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site.
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.
First picture of the Capitol building, caption read”President Donald Trump Cheered the take over” Where you not listing, he condemned it. You can do better than that.
This text is extremely tone deaf and literally false. To refer to the slave masters who raped, killed, abused, and dehumanized enslaved africans as simply “planters” and the kidnapped African slaves as “enslaved laborers” is insane and is not historically accurate. Furthermore, to refer to enslaved peoples fighting for their freedom as “rebels” like its the revolutionary war is incredibly ignorant and dumb. Fix this or I will ensure my school does not use these texts ever again
Seeing how biased this chapter is makes me severely question the credibility and honesty of the other chapters. Making the introduction primarily about January 6th and unable to comment on really says something, and using quotes from Donald Trump out of context without including him saying: “remain peaceful. No violence!” shows bias. What makes all of this even worse is that there is nothing in this chapter about the BLM riots that caused at least $1-2 billion in property damage, only calling them “Protests”, “Marches”, and “Demonstrations”. Leaving out the fact of violence in these riots and portraying them as peaceful is complete misinformation. It’s a history textbook, you can’t be subjective!
I’ve got one… intro by talking about 9/11. It’s a way more important event in this time period, it had far-reaching consequences that were addressed throughout this chapter, and frankly, it’s a lot less polarizing. It’s 2024, there’s no way to take an unbiased stand on Trump. Absolutely, we should talk about his presidency and Biden’s later on in the chapter, but let’s start with the most important stuff without letting politics get in the way.
Is there a reason why the entire near forty-year period covered in this chapter is best introduced with a frankly one-sided and polarized account of Jan 6? In this entire textbook, not one president has been covered in such a negative light — not Andrew Johnson, not Andrew Jackson, not Harding or Buchanan or Hoover or any of them, and yet we kick off this chapter by dragging Donald Trump through the mud in a massive way.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t talk about Jan 6, but honestly this introduction makes me not really trust the rest of this chapter because it seems to be the opposite of an unbiased and informational account.
[on other hand]
In paragraph 42, “the” is missing from the above phrase.
So the Chicano gangs that reside in prisons and jails?
So from my understanding, was this the catalyst act for the Civil Rights Movement?
Was the U.S. allies with Turkey? Or was storing missiles in Turkey a way for the U.S. to say to Turkey or the Soviet Union “don’t mess with us”?
Website content © American Yawp / Feedback 2024. All rights reserved.
Source: https://www.americanyawp.com/feedback_2018-2021/2018/07/30/hello-world/
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.